A
University of California in Los Angeles football player once said, “I am a UCLA
prostitute. I sell my body to them. They pay me to perform for them. When my
teammates and I perform well, the school makes lots of money…regardless of how
much money the school makes, we get the same, just our scholarship.” (Coakley
2009) That quote was from 2004. The money that collegiate sports make in 2014,
makes 2004 money look like quarters found in the sofa. According to University
of North Carolina faculty affiliate Dr. Boyce Watkins, “ad revenue from March
Madness has crossed the 1 billion dollar mark,” (Watkins 2013). For those who
are not aware, March Madness is the moniker for the NCAA D1 national
championship, one of the biggest sporting events in the world. How big?
According to Boyce, the National Football League took in $976 million; the NBA
took in $537; the MLB took in $354 million, which is not to mention all of the
t-shirts and other paraphernalia that were sold throughout the year. (Watkins
2013). The difference? The biggest earner was an amateur sport.
Big
time college sports are the perfect business model. You have a revenue source
that will never fade, and a work force that essentially works for free. That
same work force is also held responsible for maintaining another workload—from
the same institution. However, when one workload has millions and millions of
dollars at stake, where should you allegiance of time and effort reside?
However popular, intercollegiate sports contain a major flaw—the hypocrisy of
“student-athlete, while at the same time demanding that one comes before the
other. If athletes were to see themselves as investments, why would any of them
do anything other than what was destined to turn them profit? That is what the
corporations are doing. That is what the cable companies are doing. That is what their schools are doing.
I
have paid attention to college sports for my entire existence, and have read
every argument you can make when it comes to dollar bills and athletics. There
is no answer that will cover every base; each road heads in a different
direction. Do we pay them the money they deserve? That would void their amateur
status. So why don’t they just go pro? Well, there are laws saying they can’t.
We cannot avoid the fact the money is coming at these athletes, and they do not
want to dodge it. To many times have athletes been given “illegal benefits” or
“luxury recruiting,” not to mention the exploitation of their names for
profit—all to which they get nothing, yet reap every consequence if found
benefiting from themselves. What we have to realize is that we set athletes up
to fail, and expect to them succeed. We place high expectation on their
performance, while neglecting the status of their well-being. We require a full
time commitment to the field, and we require a full time commitment to the
classroom. Ultimately, we expect the poise of professionals, from the likes of amateurs.
No comments:
Post a Comment